A number of years ago, 1952 to be exact, a friend of mine asked a question. It was Korea. How, he asked, do you know the difference between the Koreans who are on our side and the ones who aren't? Sarge looked at him. "It's not that hard," he said. "If they're trying to kill you, they're not on our side. If they're not trying to kill you, maybe they're on our side, maybe not. You never really know. Don't trust any of 'em."
Here we are 58 years later with the same dilemma. It is hard to tell who the enemy really is. You hear about terrorists, Muslims who are pledged to destroy our country and way of life. We are told that we have to be tolerant to them. After all, they are people just like us. Says who? Our government, Obama and company blames past actions by the United States for the animosity that Islamic leaders show against us. Well, I say baloney.
Muslims and Islam have nothing in common with the United States. Muslims believe the Koran and follow the teaching and direction of Islamic leaders. There is no halfway about it. Muslims accept the Koran and Islam. Their quest is world domination.
There is a striking similarity between Islam and Hitler. Nobody believed what Hitler wrote in the thirties, and nobody, especially our government, seems to believe what the Muslims are telling us now. Muslims want to kill all Israelis, Christians, Buddhists, Hindus, everybody who does not profess to be Muslim. It is written in the Koran to be read and believed.
Muslims are a blood-thirsty group. Christian missionaries in the Middle-East are decapitated for speaking about Christ. Women are stoned to death for disobeying their husbands. Steal and you hand is cut off. Life means nothing to followers of Islam. How quickly we forget the pictures of dead Americans being dragged through the streets and hung from bridges in the Middle East. How quickly we forget Americans being beheaded, their executions being broadcast on the Internet. Now it is becoming more complicated as our supposed allies in the fight against terrorists are killing United States soldiers.
The Obama clique seems to be unable, or unwilling, to do anything about it. Consider Afghanistan and the attitude of the Afghan military.
During a meeting at the Kabul airport, a 48-year-old Afghan air corps pilot took out a weapon and fired at his American training partners, killing eight U.S. soldiers and a U.S. contractor. It was not the first such attack on US troops, but was the deadliest. It was the seventh such attack by members of Afghan military/security members.
To say the Afghan military is not involved makes no sense. How is the use of U.S. weapons issued to the Afghan military in these attacks explained away? How is the ammunition used of in those weapons, made in the United States and supplied to the Afghan military by the United States, explained? The Pentagon calls these incidents "rogue" attacks. But are they? Take a look at the record.
Attacks occur at training sessions and joint operations where the Afghans have the opportunity to carry out their killing sprees at close range. Their admittance to such situations is through being members of, or clothed as, Afghan security forces. The Pentagon reaction? Its response is that these incidents are the result of "combat stress" or "unknown reasons." Interesting thoughts considering these Muslim attacks were committed only against United States and NATO troops.
According to Investment Business Daily, the coalition had recorded at least 20 incidents since March 2009 where a member of the Afghan security forces or someone wearing a uniform used by them attacked coalition forces, killing a total of 36. Among recent attacks:
On April 16, an Afghan soldier walked into a meeting of NATO trainers and Afghan troops at Forward Operating Base Gamberi in eastern Afghanistan and detonated a vest of explosives hidden underneath his uniform. The blast killed six American troops.
On April 4, a man wearing an Afghan border police uniform shot and killed two U.S. soldiers in northwest Afghanistan while they were training him. The gunman reportedly was upset over the recent burning of the Koran at a Florida church.
In February, an Afghan soldier shot and killed three German soldiers and wounded six others in the northern province of Baghlan.
In January, an Afghan solider used an M-16 rifle to kill an Italian soldier and wound another in Badghis province.
A year earlier, a suicide bomber posing as an informant infiltrated a Central Intelligence Agency outpost in Afghanistan without being thoroughly searched and killed seven CIA officers. The CIA reportedly contracted with local Afghan guards to provide security at the base.
In Iraq, two U.S. troops were killed this January at the hands of an Iraqi soldier who smuggled real bullets into a training exercise and opened fire.
In May 2009, two U.S. soldiers were killed and three wounded in Mosul by a gunman wearing an Iraqi army uniform.
Three months earlier, two Iraqi policemen opened fire on U.S. soldiers lunching at a Mosul police station, killing one.
How can such terrorist activities continue if there is not government involvement by those countries in which our troops are stationed? Such countries as Iraq and Afghanistan are Islamic, controlled and run by Muslims who live by the Koran, which demands the overthrow of non-Islamic states and the deaths of those who are not Islamic believers. Because of the Koran the United States is a common enemy to all Muslims.
The Obama policy in Afghanistan does not fight the real enemy, Islamic Muslims. Through ignorance or design, it backs one Muslim terrorist group against another, both of which advocate the overthrow of the United States and the Christian-Judiac tradition upon which our country was built. These deadly attacks by Middle-East government forces on United States troops are part of Islamic overall strategy. Until Obama develops a winning policy for the Middle-East, the war in Afghanistan will follow in the footsteps of Lyndon Johnson’s Vietnam War.
While all wars are political in nature, the main thrust of the Islamic Muslim terrorist conflict in which we are now engaged is religious in nature. Make no mistake about it. This is a religious war. Lose it and we lose everything, our country, our liberty, our lives.
Here we are 58 years later with the same dilemma. It is hard to tell who the enemy really is. You hear about terrorists, Muslims who are pledged to destroy our country and way of life. We are told that we have to be tolerant to them. After all, they are people just like us. Says who? Our government, Obama and company blames past actions by the United States for the animosity that Islamic leaders show against us. Well, I say baloney.
Muslims and Islam have nothing in common with the United States. Muslims believe the Koran and follow the teaching and direction of Islamic leaders. There is no halfway about it. Muslims accept the Koran and Islam. Their quest is world domination.
There is a striking similarity between Islam and Hitler. Nobody believed what Hitler wrote in the thirties, and nobody, especially our government, seems to believe what the Muslims are telling us now. Muslims want to kill all Israelis, Christians, Buddhists, Hindus, everybody who does not profess to be Muslim. It is written in the Koran to be read and believed.
Muslims are a blood-thirsty group. Christian missionaries in the Middle-East are decapitated for speaking about Christ. Women are stoned to death for disobeying their husbands. Steal and you hand is cut off. Life means nothing to followers of Islam. How quickly we forget the pictures of dead Americans being dragged through the streets and hung from bridges in the Middle East. How quickly we forget Americans being beheaded, their executions being broadcast on the Internet. Now it is becoming more complicated as our supposed allies in the fight against terrorists are killing United States soldiers.
The Obama clique seems to be unable, or unwilling, to do anything about it. Consider Afghanistan and the attitude of the Afghan military.
During a meeting at the Kabul airport, a 48-year-old Afghan air corps pilot took out a weapon and fired at his American training partners, killing eight U.S. soldiers and a U.S. contractor. It was not the first such attack on US troops, but was the deadliest. It was the seventh such attack by members of Afghan military/security members.
To say the Afghan military is not involved makes no sense. How is the use of U.S. weapons issued to the Afghan military in these attacks explained away? How is the ammunition used of in those weapons, made in the United States and supplied to the Afghan military by the United States, explained? The Pentagon calls these incidents "rogue" attacks. But are they? Take a look at the record.
Attacks occur at training sessions and joint operations where the Afghans have the opportunity to carry out their killing sprees at close range. Their admittance to such situations is through being members of, or clothed as, Afghan security forces. The Pentagon reaction? Its response is that these incidents are the result of "combat stress" or "unknown reasons." Interesting thoughts considering these Muslim attacks were committed only against United States and NATO troops.
According to Investment Business Daily, the coalition had recorded at least 20 incidents since March 2009 where a member of the Afghan security forces or someone wearing a uniform used by them attacked coalition forces, killing a total of 36. Among recent attacks:
On April 16, an Afghan soldier walked into a meeting of NATO trainers and Afghan troops at Forward Operating Base Gamberi in eastern Afghanistan and detonated a vest of explosives hidden underneath his uniform. The blast killed six American troops.
On April 4, a man wearing an Afghan border police uniform shot and killed two U.S. soldiers in northwest Afghanistan while they were training him. The gunman reportedly was upset over the recent burning of the Koran at a Florida church.
In February, an Afghan soldier shot and killed three German soldiers and wounded six others in the northern province of Baghlan.
In January, an Afghan solider used an M-16 rifle to kill an Italian soldier and wound another in Badghis province.
A year earlier, a suicide bomber posing as an informant infiltrated a Central Intelligence Agency outpost in Afghanistan without being thoroughly searched and killed seven CIA officers. The CIA reportedly contracted with local Afghan guards to provide security at the base.
In Iraq, two U.S. troops were killed this January at the hands of an Iraqi soldier who smuggled real bullets into a training exercise and opened fire.
In May 2009, two U.S. soldiers were killed and three wounded in Mosul by a gunman wearing an Iraqi army uniform.
Three months earlier, two Iraqi policemen opened fire on U.S. soldiers lunching at a Mosul police station, killing one.
How can such terrorist activities continue if there is not government involvement by those countries in which our troops are stationed? Such countries as Iraq and Afghanistan are Islamic, controlled and run by Muslims who live by the Koran, which demands the overthrow of non-Islamic states and the deaths of those who are not Islamic believers. Because of the Koran the United States is a common enemy to all Muslims.
The Obama policy in Afghanistan does not fight the real enemy, Islamic Muslims. Through ignorance or design, it backs one Muslim terrorist group against another, both of which advocate the overthrow of the United States and the Christian-Judiac tradition upon which our country was built. These deadly attacks by Middle-East government forces on United States troops are part of Islamic overall strategy. Until Obama develops a winning policy for the Middle-East, the war in Afghanistan will follow in the footsteps of Lyndon Johnson’s Vietnam War.
While all wars are political in nature, the main thrust of the Islamic Muslim terrorist conflict in which we are now engaged is religious in nature. Make no mistake about it. This is a religious war. Lose it and we lose everything, our country, our liberty, our lives.
No comments:
Post a Comment